Lega Ciclismo Professionistico utilizza cookie e tecnologie simili per analizzare come i visitatori utilizzano il nostro sito Web, per consentire la condivisione di contenuti sui social media e per adattare i contenuti e gli annunci pubblicitari del sito alle vostre preferenze. Tali cookie vengono inseriti anche da terze parti. Facendo clic su "Accetta" accetti questo. Consulta le nostre impostazioni dei cookie per una descrizione dei cookie per i quali chiediamo il tuo permesso.

Seguici su instagram

UCI: nominati i tre componenti della Commissione che dovrà esaminare il dossier USADA
UCI: nominati i tre componenti della Commissione che dovrà esaminare il dossier USADA UCI: nominati i tre componenti della Commissione che dovrà esaminare il dossier USADA



Tags Commissione indipendente Malcolm Holmes QC Pat McQuaid Sir Philip Otton Tanni Grey-Thompson UCI

Autore articolo:

Sir Philip Otton

Sir Philip Otton

John Coates, president of the International Council of Arbitration for Sport, selected the three-member commission announced today. Former Court of Appeal judge, Sir Philip Otton will chair the commission. He will be assisted by Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson, a Peer member of the U.K. House of Lords and Paralympic champion, and by Australian lawyer, Malcolm Holmes QC.

The UCI will fund the commission and said its members will act independently. The commission will be able to examine “without limitation” relevant documents in possession of current and former UCI staff, including McQuaid, former president Hein Verbruggen and anti-doping experts Anne Gripper, Francesca Rossi and Mario Zorzoli.

A separate Terms of Reference released on Friday listed 11 points for commission to consider.

The points in brief:

1. Are the allegations in the USADA’s Reasoned Decision well founded?
2. Did the UCI know what Armstrong and his team were doing? If not, should it have known?
3. Are the UCI’s anti-doping policies inadequate or not enforced sufficiently?
4. Did the UCI have evidence of doping and did it fail to act?
5. Did the UCI fail to detect doping when Armstrong returned in 2009?
6. Did Armstrong or his team pay the UCI and if so, was it appropriate?
7. Did the UCI discourage people from speaking out?
8. Did the UCI adequately cooperate with USADA’s investigation?
9. Should dopers be able to work within cycling in the future?
10. Did the UCI face a conflict of interest in promoting cycling and investigating Armstrong?
11. Are the current controls adequate and compliant with the World Anti-Doping Code (WADC)?

McQuaid explained that the selection of the commission’s members and their scope shows the UCI means business. He said, “The UCI wants to get to the bottom of the Lance Armstrong affair and put cycling back on the right track.”

In its release, the UCI said that details of a previously announced stakeholder consultation would be announced in the coming weeks. The consultation is due to take place in the first quarter of 2013 and to look at the sport’s future.

fonte Velo News – Gregor Brown

Press release: Sir Philip Otton, Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson and Malcolm Holmes QC to comprise Independent Commission looking into Lance Armstrong affair


Former Court of Appeal judge Sir Philip Otton will chair the Independent Commission to look into the issues and allegations contained in the USADA decision relating to the Armstrong affair. Sir Philip Otton will be assisted by UK House of Lords Peer and Paralympic Champion Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson, and Australian lawyer, Malcolm Holmes QC.

Tanni Grey-Thompson

Tanni Grey-Thompson


Pat McQuaid, President of the UCI, said: “I am grateful to John Coates, President of the International Council of Arbitration for Sport, for assembling such a high calibre and truly Independent Commission. The wide ranging terms of reference demonstrate the Commission’s determination to review fully the issues contained in the USADA report and I welcome that.”

McQuaid continued: “As I have said previously, the Commission’s report and recommendations are critical to restoring confidence in the sport of cycling and in the UCI as its governing body. We will co-operate fully with the Commission and provide them with whatever they need to conduct their enquiry and we urge all other interested stakeholders to do the same. We will listen to and act on the Commission’s recommendations.”

The Commission, which will act as an external body and will be fully independent of the UCI, ICAS and CAS, will hold a hearing in London between 9-26 April 2013. It then aims to submit its report to the UCI by 1 June 2013, or shortly after. The purpose and wide-ranging remit of the Commission is set out in the attached Terms of Reference, which was drawn up by the Commission members themselves.

The independence of the Commission is further demonstrated by its appointment of counsel to assist it as well as the need for the UCI to have its own legal representation at these hearings and throughout the process.
McQuaid added: “Some of our critics have suggested that this Commission would not be fully independent. They were wrong. The UCI had no influence on the selection of the Commission members.

“The appointment of these three eminent figures demonstrates clearly that the UCI wants to get to the bottom of the Lance Armstrong affair and put cycling back on the right track. Rather than simply attacking the UCI, our critics now have an opportunity to be part of the solution. I would ask them, therefore, to make their representation to the Independent Commission – and to start to put cycling first.

“The costs of the Independent Commission will be a significant burden on the UCI, however it is clear that only such a decisive and transparent examination of the past will answer our critics by thoroughly examining our assertion that the UCI’s anti-doping procedures are and have been among the most innovative and stringent in sport. ”

In the coming two weeks, the UCI will also be announcing details of a wide-ranging Stakeholder Consultation to look into the future of cycling and discuss how to bring in lasting improvements, as well as to tackle other issues of concern within the sport.

UCI Communication Services

Esplora altre news